Thursday, May 19, 2011

The blotter

The arrest of Congressman Hinchey's wife, Allison Lee (who's also a noted Albany lobbyist), on a DWI charge has predictably generated lots of comments to our newspaper's website. Most are partisan shots at the congressman, but some are critical of the newspaper.

Consider this excerpt:

"The real issue here is the Freeman and what they consider newsworthy. Unlike other publications, the Freeman makes a sport out of mudslinging and printing the names of people charged with misdemeanors (felonies are a different matter). It even goes so far as to print court updates of pleas, etc. Then, if an offender is someone of any note around town, the person gets an entire article - and in this case, a photo too. This is just wrong.

"People make mistakes and when they get into trouble, they want more than ever just to be left alone to deal with it. It is sad that the Freeman enables its readers to revel in the misery of their neighbors."

I'm afraid I don't have the energy to explain to someone why this story is news. Or why the news is more significant if it involves "someone of any note." History says such explanations would fall on deaf ears.

I will say, however, that community newspapers typically report lesser offenses than larger newspapers. Why? Because newspapers that serve a larger market often can't devote the space to the many more misdemeanors they'd have to report. Moreover, a major felony in our community is likely to be reported on the front page. The same kind of felony in New York City might attract a brief story inside a newspaper (or maybe even go unreported), because those crimes are more commonplace in big cities.

Point is, there is a procedure and standards for reporting police news. All newspapers have them. And the bottom line is that newspapers try to inform their readers as best they can with the limited resources at their disposal ... even if the news is uncomfortable for some people to read.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Ralph Richardson said...

The Poughkeepsie Journal does not print the names of non felony arrests or misdemeanor tickets. They seem to do fine without exploiting others misery. This is an ethical decision by your editorial board and publisher. It is easy to see which side you come down on. Sell the paper (ad revenue) at all costs.

May 19, 2011 1:12 PM 
Blogger Ira Fusfeld said...

Ralph: As I said, the larger the newspaper, the less likely it will print these kinds of arrests.

May 19, 2011 1:27 PM 
Anonymous John Gielgud said...

The Poughkeepsie Journal printed Mrs. Hinchey's name in an article about her misdemeanor arrest on the front of its local section. Before you get snippy, Ralph, you should familiarize yourself with the Journal's policy, which isn't a blanket policy on withholding names of alleged misdemeanants. There are exceptions, and they're made for good, newsworthy reasons.

May 19, 2011 5:40 PM 
Blogger Martin McPhillips said...

My first thought is that news is news and a police blotter is a public record.

My second thought is that being arrested does not mean you are guilty, but the notice of the arrest in the paper carries a stigma of guilt nonetheless.

Motor vehicle arrests -- DUIs for instance -- have become a pretty serious matter in American society in light of the number of people killed in accidents every year. If that many were killed in one of our small wars there would be people marching in the streets, right behind Maurice Hinchey.

Perhaps the police blotter should be updated, at least when someone is found not guilty or the charges are dropped, just in case he wants to show that to his employer, neighbors, or parents (or kids).

There are lines to be drawn in coverage, such as not identifying victims of sex crimes.

When it comes to the Freeman, the only time (app. six years ago) I really thought that it lost its dignity was when it splashed the arrest of an 80-something SUNY New Paltz professor emeritus on a sexual battery charge on the front page with a big sensational headline. The charge needed to be reported, but not tabloided, and the charge itself did not hold up. Better judgement would not have played it the way it was played, and an old warhorse on the local scene, entering his dotage, was disgraced and humiliated. That was not necessary.

May 19, 2011 6:24 PM 
Blogger Bill Olsen said...

I agree with Martin. It would cast the workings of our local law enforcement/judicial process to include later stages of the disposition of a case the Freeman brings to our attention. We don't need lists ad nauseum of the workings of local courts. But if the Freeman were to enact a policy of following through with coverage of any arrest it takes upon itself to cover at the time of arrest, it seems fair to mention later on if, for example, the charges were dropped.

June 4, 2011 11:51 AM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home